Re: I like the new output of 'ls'

Garrett Rooney wrote:

>On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 03:53:00AM +0200, Branko _ibej wrote:
>
>
>
>>Righ, fine, great, now please enlighten me as to why we seem to have yet
>>another human-readable date format?
>>
>>I'm very close to -1 here. I suggest some effort should be made to make
>>the h-r date format customizable in ~/.subversion/options, and perhaps
>>with a --date-format flag (for output parsers). Then have "svn ls" just
>>use svn_time_to_human_nts(), or whatever the function is. I wouldn't
>>mind if there were separate customizations for "avn log" and "svn ls".
>>
>>
>
>i would love it if we had a 'short format' and a 'log format', so 'svn
>ls' and 'svn log' could both use standard functions for thier needs.
>
>right now though, the output of svn_time_to_human_nts() is just too
>long. it fills like half the screen on an 80 column display.
>
>

Yes, that's why this is an auspicious time for adding date format
customization.

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org