Re: [PATCH] Skip-deltas, for review

Daniel Berlin wrote:

>On 26 Jul 2002, Greg Hudson wrote:
>
>
>I can say that when converting the gcc repo, where we have thousands upon
>thousands of revisions of various files that are moderate size, like the
>ChangeLog, if i make it deltify (it's 0k-800k depending on the
>revision, so most won't deltify unless i up the stream size) without
>skip-deltas and the delta combiner, trying to access revision 100 out of
>4000 takes literally 10 minutes.
>With just the delta combiner, it's 20 seconds.
>With these two patches, it takes 4 seconds.
>

Hey, does that mean you've been testing the combiner? Thank you, thank
you! And with such wonderful results, too.

>The first time is unacceptable for use.
>The second is okay, but could be a lot better.
>

Yes, 20 seconds is still a lot -- although, compared to 10 minutes ...

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org