Re: I like the new output of 'ls'

Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:

>I like the output of 'svn ls' now, oh yes I do. Nice job, Garrett.
>
>Notice the distinct similarity to 'ls -l':
>
>$ svn ls http://svn.collab.net/repos/logos
>http://svn.collab.net/repos/logos:
>_ 25 anonymou 2807 Jul 25 19:07 README.html
>_ 42 anonymou 1803 Jul 26 11:07 VOTES
>_ 42 anonymou 5040 Jul 26 11:07 entries.html
>_ 42 anonymou 0 Jul 26 11:07 images/
>_ 29 anonymou 0 Jul 26 00:07 src/
>
>$ ls -l logos
>total 24
>-rw-r--r-- 1 sussman users 2807 Jul 26 09:13 README.html
>-rw-r--r-- 1 sussman users 1803 Jul 26 12:04 VOTES
>-rw-r--r-- 1 sussman users 5040 Jul 26 12:04 entries.html
>drwxr-xr-x 3 sussman users 1024 Jul 26 16:04 images/
>drwxr-xr-x 3 sussman users 512 Jul 26 09:13 src/
>
>

Righ, fine, great, now please enlighten me as to why we seem to have yet
another human-readable date format?

I'm very close to -1 here. I suggest some effort should be made to make
the h-r date format customizable in ~/.subversion/options, and perhaps
with a --date-format flag (for output parsers). Then have "svn ls" just
use svn_time_to_human_nts(), or whatever the function is. I wouldn't
mind if there were separate customizations for "avn log" and "svn ls".

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org