Re: svn paths and the handbook
From: Alexis Huxley <ahuxley_at_gmx.net>
 
Date: 2002-07-26 10:59:37 CEST 
Hi Russell,
 I'm a svn newbie too, but I think I can answer some of your questions
 > 3. the path to the repository, that the web server sees.  In the svn url
 Where the repository is on the disk, we have no idea; the remote web
 This confused me a bit too 'cos I thought they have a repository
 On mine (http://dione.no-ip.org/svnXXXX) I present the repository as 
 (Remove the XXXX; I've seen Google probing URLs I've put in mails to
 > 4. the path to the revision inside the repository, I assume this is
 No, the 'svn' is part of the presentation of the repository; you broke
 > a path in a conventional filesystem that either the web server (for dav
 Err ... what happened to 'russells' in the svnadmin? 
 > A related question:  Why does this fail?
 Because you create 'a' into which it will create 'trunk'.
 I've found it less confusing to create the layout - with trunk and stuff
         $ mkdir a 
 Then you have everything set up, and you can do:
         $ svn import <repos_url> a a      
 - or something like that. This also has a cosmetic advantage that
         123: made project dir
 you just get:
         123: imported new project with dirs and subdirs
 > The handbook has a suggested layout for multiple projects in one
 Exactly; one disadvantage which I saw Justin sort of point out is
         svn co <repos_url>/projectA/trunk
 you do:
         svn co <repos_url>/projectA/trunk projectA
 The alternative - as someone else suggested - is arrange things like
         /trunks/projectA
 But I don't think that is as modular.
 Alexis
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
  | 
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.