Re: svn paths and the handbook
From: Alexis Huxley <ahuxley_at_gmx.net>
Date: 2002-07-26 10:59:37 CEST
Hi Russell,
I'm a svn newbie too, but I think I can answer some of your questions
> 3. the path to the repository, that the web server sees. In the svn url
Where the repository is on the disk, we have no idea; the remote web
This confused me a bit too 'cos I thought they have a repository
On mine (http://dione.no-ip.org/svnXXXX) I present the repository as
(Remove the XXXX; I've seen Google probing URLs I've put in mails to
> 4. the path to the revision inside the repository, I assume this is
No, the 'svn' is part of the presentation of the repository; you broke
> a path in a conventional filesystem that either the web server (for dav
Err ... what happened to 'russells' in the svnadmin?
> A related question: Why does this fail?
Because you create 'a' into which it will create 'trunk'.
I've found it less confusing to create the layout - with trunk and stuff
$ mkdir a
Then you have everything set up, and you can do:
$ svn import <repos_url> a a
- or something like that. This also has a cosmetic advantage that
123: made project dir
you just get:
123: imported new project with dirs and subdirs
> The handbook has a suggested layout for multiple projects in one
Exactly; one disadvantage which I saw Justin sort of point out is
svn co <repos_url>/projectA/trunk
you do:
svn co <repos_url>/projectA/trunk projectA
The alternative - as someone else suggested - is arrange things like
/trunks/projectA
But I don't think that is as modular.
Alexis
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.