Re: I want my -d option back to checkout
From: Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz_at_apache.org>
Date: 2002-07-25 21:40:41 CEST
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 02:21:31PM -0500, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
Here's what I did.
svn co http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk -d subversion
Here's what I got:
svn: invalid option character: d
Most subcommands take file and/or directory arguments, recursing
Available subcommands:
Subversion is a tool for revision control.
--- My terminal is only about twenty-five lines high, so the top part got chopped off. I did run svn help co, but didn't catch the destination part at top of the help. Regardless, svn should have given me the syntax on 'svn co' in this case rather than giving me the completely unhelpful message it did. I'd be content (still peeved) if the -d case were specially caught by svn and said: "Yoo-hoo, we don't support this CVS syntax. Omit the -d and all will be well." The frustrating thing for me is that this changed at such a late date and I already knew that svn could do it. Yes, I skipped the whole discussion, but still, I'm positing that this is a needless regression from CVS. -- justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Thu Jul 25 21:41:13 2002 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.