Re: svn commit: rev 2684 - trunk/subversion/include trunk/subversion/mod_dav_svn trunk/subversion/clients/cmdline trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_dav

cmpilato@collab.net wrote:
>> But I don't get this? Why do we hide 'M' as an action, and instead
>> show 'U'?
>
> The 'M' is simply more "correct" for internal purposes. The 'U'
> that the client binary prints exists only for consistency with the
> kind of output 'svn update' yields.

Oh, so there is no 'U' coming out as an action anymore, they are all
'M'? Or is there both 'U' and 'M' coming out and we just don't want to
tell the user the distinction?

There was a similar thing on that very same spot some time ago,
changing some other letters around. Luckily, that got removed some
time ago.

>> Should the XML output have the same action letter as well?
>
> Sure. I guess. I dunno nuttin' 'bout the XML output.

Well, since our log output format is machine parseable, the XML output
does not need to be any more machine parseable. So whatever is fine
for the normal output, should be fine for the XML output.

-- Naked

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jul 25 09:43:31 2002