Eric Gillespie <epg@pretzelnet.org> writes:
> But i don't think that's what people want; it doesn't sound
> particularly useful. I think when people give multiple files to
> svn log, they want to see the history of each of those files.
>
> > + once -- that is, if both FILE_A and FILE_B changed in that revision,
> > + it won't be printed twice, only once.
>
> I think it should be, but in separate sections; i want to see the
> full history of each file that i listed.
>
> + If you need the (possibly intersecting) sets of revisions printed
> > + separately, run the command twice, once for each file.
>
> I'll do this if you really believe people want to ask your question
> more than they want to ask mine.
I don't know which most people would prefer, if they had experience
with both. I know I've been finding the current behavior just as
useful as the other behavior, and have never missed the other
behavior. But that's just one person.
In any case, it shouldn't be in the issue tracker, it should be a
discussion on the dev list. Subversion was behaving as documented, so
no issue there. (There will be an issue if we decide to change the
behavior, obviously :-) ).
I personally have zero desire to change this, being satisfied with the
current interface, so am not going to drive the thread. It's all you,
baby...
-K
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Jul 21 07:35:52 2002