Martin Pool <mbp@sourcefrog.net> writes:
> On 16 Jul 2002, "B. W. Fitzpatrick" <fitz@red-bean.com> wrote:
> > svn's built in help is already very nice--detailed yet concise. Why
> > muck it up by stuffing in a buncha info that should be in the
> > manual/handbook.
>
> I certainly agree that the built-in help should not duplicate
> the manual or give introductory or tutorial information.
>
> It seems to me that it's consistent with svn's existing code,
> and with contemporary free unix programs to give quick-reference
> information just to jog the memory of somebody already familiar
> with the program. Exactly where that line is is a matter of
> taste of course. I'm just suggesting that the magic names
> for svn:keywords and so on have equally much claim to be in
> there as the top-level commands. Five or ten lines listing
> them would not bloat the built-in help, and would be handy
> for somebody who's come from CVS and can't work out why their
> $Things$ don't work.
I don't have a problem with listing out the magic keywords... my -1
was against gdb style help and pages and pages of stuff.
Are you up for submitting a patch for the above? :)
-Fitz
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jul 16 15:10:16 2002