Re: Slowing code churn in libsvn_wc

Karl Fogel <kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net> writes:

> So I'd like to request that until Alpha is released, we confine
> ourselves to fixing bugs in the current libsvn_wc code, and not try to
> make any more forward progress on issue #749.

Perhaps we should revert 2470 as it introduces a regression. The
second commit in the following sequence

$ svn mkdir foo
$ svn mkdir foo/bar
$ touch foo/bar/zig
$ svn add foo/bar/zig
$ svn ci
$ svn cp foo foo2
$ echo x >> foo2/bar/zig
$ svn ci

fails with "foo2/bar already locked".

> Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> writes:
> > This patch implements a parent-child lock relationship. It passes
> > the regression tests, including Justin's new one.

-- 
Philip Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org