On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 11:34:33PM -0500, Karl Fogel wrote:
> Kevin, thanks for the detailed post, and the filing of issue #792.
>
> I will be working on this this weekend, along with other ppl no doubt!
(Un)fortunately not me. I'm going camping tomorrow and won't be back untill
Sunday night. Sorry :( If there's anything else I can do for you try to
think of it before about 11:00-0400
>
> > Note that I wasn't trying to commit all of these changes :) Particularly note
> > the diff for ./libsvn_wc/props.c and ./libsvn_client/prop_commands.c which
> > seem to contain a delta for both of the revs I tried to commit.
>
> The main thing is, there are no spurious diffs there, right? That is,
> no changes that you didn't make yourself, and the ones you did make
> look as you expected them to?
>
Yes and no. There's no changes that I didn't make. It's just that the diff I
sent (after the second commit) shows the changes made in both commits. I.e.
the patch you see would be for both rev 2485 and 2488. However, all of the
other files not involved in one of these two commits seems to be okay.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Kevin Pilch-Bisson http://www.pilch-bisson.net
"Historically speaking, the presences of wheels in Unix
has never precluded their reinvention." - Larry Wall
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Sat Jul 13 06:52:32 2002