Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> writes:
> I have been thinking about putting the svn_wc_adm_access_t structures
> into a hierarchy, with parents keeping a list of children, and
> children a pointer to the parent. Then the initial commit processing
> could lock the entire directory tree being committed before starting
> the commit, and svn_wc_process_committed would not need to take out
> any new locks. This might help with the cacheing as well, giving
> parents access to children and vice-versa.
>
> svn_error_t *
> svn_wc_adm_open(svn_wc_adm_access_t **adm_access,
> svn_wc_adm_access_t *parent_access,
> const char *path,
> svn_boolean_t write_lock,
> apr_pool_t *pool);
Yick.
If we need a hierarchy, can it at least be hidden inside the access_t
structures? Passing two of them in the public interfaces seems
awkward...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jul 12 17:42:23 2002