** Reply to message from Mark Plotnick <plotnick@ensodex.com> on Thu, 11 Jul
2002 08:45:14 -0500
I built apache and successfully did a 'svn co http://....'.
YES !
Finally. Ready to do some real work with it. Hope
the rest of the devs in my project like it better than CVS.
Especially interested in the ability to change dir structue.
/Mark
> Actually, I was trying to "cheat" and used a prebuilt apache for solaris.
>
> With everyting else in Apache being dynamically loaded/configured, it's hard to
> fanthom that this one thing, Berkley DB, has to be compiled in.
>
> Oh well, I'm in the process of building apache. Hopefully, that will
> take care of it.
>
> /Mark
>
> > Mark Plotnick <plotnick@ensodex.com> writes:
> >
> > > No such file or directory: Bad database version: 3.2.9
> > >
> > > I have a very recent version (0.,13.2) of svn that I have
> > > built together with BerkleyDB 4.0.14.
> > >
> > > As far as I know the only Berkley DB I have is the one
> > > that I loaded for svn's sake. Why is apache complaining
> > > about 3.2.9 ? Is that somehow hard coded into apache ?
> >
> > 4.0.14 is "hard coded" into mod_dav_svn, it then does a run-time check
> > to determine which version Apache is using. The error you see almost
> > certainly means you built apache against 3.2.9 and not against
> > 4.0.14. Did you pass '--with-dbm=db4' when you configured apache?
> >
> > --
> > Philip Martin
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jul 11 16:30:49 2002