Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 11:29:46AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 02:13:17PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > It just seems intuitive (as I've tried the command several times still
> > > expecting it to work :) that if I say "recursive" and don't pass an arg,
> > > I mean ".". Obviously, since recursive is not the default, and implicit
> > > dot-target for that case wouldn't make any sense, nor would it work in a
> > > logical manner.
> > >
> > > Just a thought. I'm not really hung up on it.
> >
> > FWIW, I agree with Ben.
> >
> > If I say --recursive, I implicitly want '.'. -- justin
>
> i do seem to get caught doing 'svn revert --recursive' and forgetting
> the . an awful lot, so i'm going to have to agree, the dot should be
> implicit in the --recursive case.
Oh, I always get caught by it, too.
But <up-arrow><space><period><enter> just isn't that hard to deal
with. :-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jul 10 21:33:18 2002