Re: Revert has no implicit dot-target.

On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 12:46:35PM -0500, cmpilato@collab.net wrote:
> Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org> writes:
>
> > I would say that doing "svn revert --recursive" should have an implicit
> > dot-target though. "svn revert" should fail as it already does.
>
> Why compilicate the UI like that for no gain? Just use the command
> like the usage message says to and be done with it.

It just seems intuitive (as I've tried the command several times still
expecting it to work :) that if I say "recursive" and don't pass an arg,
I mean ".". Obviously, since recursive is not the default, and implicit
dot-target for that case wouldn't make any sense, nor would it work in a
logical manner.

Just a thought. I'm not really hung up on it.

-- 
Debian     - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://linux1394.sourceforge.net/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo       - http://www.deqo.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org