Re: Revert has no implicit dot-target.

On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:24:59PM -0400, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> i believe the justification is that revert can cause one to lose data,
> so we are protecting a user from their own carelessness by requiring
> them to say exactly what they mean.
>
> mentioning it in the help output seems like a good idea though.

And, if I were to pay close attention, I would see:

"usage: revert TARGET1 [TARGET2 [TARGET3 ... ]]\n\n"

TARGET1 isn't in brackets. I still wonder if it would be better
to make this *really* explicit in the help output. -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jul 10 19:31:05 2002