Re: [PATCH] Unify human represented timestamp formats.
From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_newton.ch.collab.net>
Date: 2002-06-22 21:20:01 CEST
Nuutti Kotivuori <naked@iki.fi> writes:
I'd add weekday in there, it's very important, IMHO (I'm sorry if I
Yes, I know this theoretically opens up a whole can of worms about
> The format can - and should - be changed if a real consensus is gotten
Okay, I'd like to propose:
Sat 2002-06-22 11:14:42 +03:00
Personal aside: I suspect this might be hard to get consensus on, but
Sat 22 Jun 2002 11:14:42 +03:00
That's _slightly_ more complicated for automated parsers, though, so
Sat 22 Jun 2002-06-22 11:14:42 +03:00
...but I suppose that would cause much gnashing of teeth and hurling
> The dubious part is 'svnlook'. Should that use this same function?
Oh, the question is, should it print dates in the server's local
<thinks>
You know, I think we need both options. I'm not sure which should be
Hmmm. I'm beginning to wonder if we don't really need a date format
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.