Re: Subversion 0.13.0 [Pre-Alpha] released - a report on successes and problems
From: Jonathan Leffler <jleffler_at_us.ibm.com>
Date: 2002-06-20 01:06:57 CEST
Sorry if I'm boring the pants off everyone - tell me to stop when
I tried the concurrent update example again, and it might be 'just' a
$ svn up & sleep 1 && svn up
subversion/libsvn_wc/lock.c:47
I'd regard that as a reasonable error message - in line with your
The first instance of svn updated
When I repeated the exercise again (no updates waiting), then both
--
Jonathan Leffler (jleffler@us.ibm.com)
STSM, Informix Database Engineering, IBM Data Management Solutions
4100 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, CA 94025
Tel: +1 650-926-6921 Tie-Line: 630-6921
"I don't suffer from insanity; I enjoy every minute of it!"
Ben
Collins-Sussman To: Jonathan Leffler/Menlo Park/IBM@IBMUS
<sussman@collab.n cc: SVN Dev List <dev@subversion.tigris.org>, users@subversion.tigris.org
et> Subject: Re: Subversion 0.13.0 [Pre-Alpha] released - a report on successes and
Sent by: problems
sussman@collab.ne
t
06/19/02 03:13 PM
"Jonathan Leffler" <jleffler@us.ibm.com> writes:
> Sorry about the way Lotus Notes handles embedded messages...
>
> Another question about 'svn up' - what prevents concurrent execution of
> 'svn up' on the same directory hierarchy? I tried:
>
> svn up & sleep 1 && svn up
>
> I didn't get an error about "already in use" (at least, not explicitly);
I
> got:
>
> subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_files.c:555
> apr_error: #17, src_err 0 : <File exists>
> ./.svn/tmp/entries
That's odd. Updates and commits *do* drop lockfiles into each .svn/
area, and do exactly what you're talking about below.
So I'm curious why that error isn't about an existing lockfile...
[...snippage...]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jun 20 01:05:12 2002
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.