Re: Subversion 0.13.0 [Pre-Alpha] released - a report on successes and problems
From: Jonathan Leffler <jleffler_at_us.ibm.com>
Date: 2002-06-20 01:06:57 CEST
Sorry if I'm boring the pants off everyone - tell me to stop when
I tried the concurrent update example again, and it might be 'just' a
$ svn up & sleep 1 && svn up
subversion/libsvn_wc/lock.c:47
I'd regard that as a reasonable error message - in line with your
The first instance of svn updated
When I repeated the exercise again (no updates waiting), then both
-- Jonathan Leffler (jleffler@us.ibm.com) STSM, Informix Database Engineering, IBM Data Management Solutions 4100 Bohannon Drive, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Tel: +1 650-926-6921 Tie-Line: 630-6921 "I don't suffer from insanity; I enjoy every minute of it!" Ben Collins-Sussman To: Jonathan Leffler/Menlo Park/IBM@IBMUS <sussman@collab.n cc: SVN Dev List <dev@subversion.tigris.org>, users@subversion.tigris.org et> Subject: Re: Subversion 0.13.0 [Pre-Alpha] released - a report on successes and Sent by: problems sussman@collab.ne t 06/19/02 03:13 PM "Jonathan Leffler" <jleffler@us.ibm.com> writes: > Sorry about the way Lotus Notes handles embedded messages... > > Another question about 'svn up' - what prevents concurrent execution of > 'svn up' on the same directory hierarchy? I tried: > > svn up & sleep 1 && svn up > > I didn't get an error about "already in use" (at least, not explicitly); I > got: > > subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_files.c:555 > apr_error: #17, src_err 0 : <File exists> > ./.svn/tmp/entries That's odd. Updates and commits *do* drop lockfiles into each .svn/ area, and do exactly what you're talking about below. So I'm curious why that error isn't about an existing lockfile... [...snippage...] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Thu Jun 20 01:05:12 2002 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.