Re: [Issue 616] New - does "svn checkout" really need the -d option?

[ ... ]
> + What if we just did away with it, and made checkout syntax
> + look something like this:
> +
> + svn checkout http://svn.blah.com/repos/myproj/trunk [DIRNAME]
> +
> + where if DIRNAME is absent, it defaults to the last component
> + of the url.

So DIRNAME would be "trunk" in the example above? Looks strange to me.
"myproj/trunk" would be better IMHO. This way you would easily get
"myproj/branches/V4.12" etc pp.

-- 
-- Josef Wolf -- jw@raven.inka.de --
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org