> From: Joe Orton [mailto:joe@manyfish.co.uk]
> Sent: 03 June 2002 13:28
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 11:35:54AM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
>>> From: brane@xbc.nu [mailto:brane@xbc.nu]
>>> Sent: 03 June 2002 11:20
>>> I'd like to revert the upgrade until it does.
>>> Is there any really strong reason we should be using
>>> 0.21.0 (except for the mod-deflate stuff)?
>>
>> No, not really, apart from it being the latest neon release.
>> You need two patches to neon to get it to work on windows.
>> One I sent to the list and one Joe sent to the list.
>
> Does the ssize_t patch I posted work then? (I can't test it myself)
Yes, it works. Just tested.
>> There is another problem that has rissen its ugly head:
>> neon now requires zlib, otherwise svn will fail on the
>> deflate stuff. I thought that was supposed to be
>> transparent, but apparently it isn't (yet?).
>
> It only works when zlib is *not* used, so the passthrough code is
> working fine. neon was giving the "truncated response" decompress error
> if the acceptance callback decided not to accept a response (which would
> always happen in ra_dav with the error_accepter for 2xx responses).
Ah...
> A fix is below - I can do a new neon release once someone has confirmed
> that the ssize_t patch works. (Does SVN even work on a deflate-enabled
> server without this change?)
Oddly enough, it seemed to work.
> --- ne_compress.c 19 May 2002 14:38:15 -0000 1.15
> +++ ne_compress.c 3 Jun 2002 10:37:02 -0000 1.16
> @@ -348,6 +348,7 @@
> free(ctx->enchdr);
>
> switch (ctx->state) {
> + case NE_Z_BEFORE_DATA:
> case NE_Z_PASSTHROUGH:
> case NE_Z_FINISHED:
> ret = NE_OK;
Sander
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jun 3 13:46:53 2002