cmpilato@collab.net wrote:
> Hm. I think that the very act of checking out apr and apr-util into
> my subversion source tree indicates my desire to use *those trees*
> as my APR and APRUtil (respectively) of choice, and is therefore
> nearly as good as passing the --with-apr[util] flag to configure.
Actually, I think this thing has something to do with the release
tarballs. Bootstrap tarballs are a non-issue since they should always
use the in tree apr and apr-util for the static compilation.
If the release tarball does not contain apr and apr-util, then me
putting those directories inside the subversion directory is like
saying: "Use these."
On the other hand, if the apr and apr-util directories come with the
subversion release, the existence of those directories cannot be taken
as a sign of anything.
Personally I'd like to use the system ones at all times unless the
user really specifies otherwise - but right now I must say that it is
a lot handier to have it use the in-tree one's automatically during
building, as long as APR is as changing as it is.
-- Naked
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Jun 1 14:34:29 2002