Re: more fallout from rev 2024?

Philip Martin wrote:
>
> Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> writes:
>
> > % svn st -u
> > _ * 2025 000000)
> > _ * 2025 (8‚จพ6
> > M 2025 ./subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c
> > M_ 2025 ./subversion/tests/clients/cmdline/basic_tests.py
> > _ * 2025 ./subversion/tests/libsvn_subr/time-test(`
> > Head revision: 2026
>
> valgrind is reporting the use of free'd memory for 'svn st -u':

Maybe we should add valgrind to make check if configure finds it on
the system so we catch these earlier than waiting for a user to
stumble across a bug.

Has anybody thought about using Tinderbox

http://www.mozilla.org/projects/tinderbox/

to help subversion track breakage?

Blair

-- 
Blair Zajac <blair@orcaware.com>
Web and OS performance plots - http://www.orcaware.com/orca/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org