[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: rev 1996 - branches/issue-654-dev/subversion/libsvn_fs

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_lyra.org>
Date: 2002-05-22 23:26:02 CEST

On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 08:52:27AM -0500, cmpilato@tigris.org wrote:
> Hm...looks like we can't remove the stabilization walk until we find a
> better time to mark our representations as immutable, or stop using a
> mutability flag on those skels. Major disappointment.
> +
> +AH! Of course. I think the representations need only to store a
> +TXN_ID (instead of a mutability flag) and simply compare that with the
> +current transaction ID as a mutability test, just like the node
> +revisions will. *That* should eliminate the stabilization walk, since
> +the minute the txn is committed, all those reps become effectively
> +immutable.

Yup. This idea came from our first round-table talk about the node-id
problem back in March.


Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed May 22 23:23:43 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.