Re: ISO-8601 dates and issue 614

brane@xbc.nu writes:
> Argh, had this on my todo list but forgot ...
>
> I really don't see why you'd want to avoid a wc conversion for the
> timestamps in particular. We already know we'll have to convert when
> the private URLs change from using node ids to using rev/path, so we
> might as well do both changes at the same time. The "always use HEAD"
> motto of the pre-Alpha stage should hold for working copies, too.

Actually, it turns out we're not going to need a grand wc conversion
for the version-resource-url change (see gstein's change of rev 1863).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon May 13 04:57:19 2002