[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: dumb status question

From: <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2002-05-08 19:01:46 CEST

Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@collab.net> writes:

> Look at this output:
>
> [sussman@kepler:~/projects/svn]$ svn st -u
> __ * 1904 ./subversion/clients/cmdline
> _ * 1904 ./subversion/clients/cmdline/trace-update.c
> __ * 1904 ./subversion/libsvn_repos
> _ * 1904 ./subversion/libsvn_repos/delta.c
> __ * 1904 ./subversion/svnlook
> _ * 1904 ./subversion/svnlook/main.c
> Head revision: 1906
> [sussman@kepler:~/projects/svn]$ svn up
> U ./subversion/svnlook/main.c
> U ./subversion/clients/cmdline/trace-update.c
> U ./subversion/libsvn_repos/delta.c
> Updated to revision 1906.
>
>
> I'm confused about the three parent-directories showing up as
> 'changed' in the status output. Have we always shown them? If not,
> what's going on? If so, why?

I'll look into it. Probably related to my recent disjoint-url update
support.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed May 8 19:02:06 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.