[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: rev 1895 - trunk/subversion/clients/cmdline trunk/subversion/tests/clients/cmdline/svntest

From: Nuutti Kotivuori <naked_at_iki.fi>
Date: 2002-05-07 22:17:06 CEST

kfogel@tigris.org wrote:
> It's confusing for `svn update' to print "Updated to revision N"
> when no changes were received, and your working copy may even have
> been entirely at revision N prior to the update. Make update output
> print a different concluding line if no real changes were received:

Actually I must disagree a bit on the way this is done.

The thing that is the important distinction, in my opinion, is that
did the revision number change or not. It's confusing to see "Updated
to revision N" when the revision was the same as before - but it's not
as confusing to see that when the revision _was_ changed, just that
there were no changes.

So I vote for either three messages - update with changes, update
without changes and update but no new revision - or that the different
messages comes only in the case where there is no new revision.

-- Naked

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue May 7 22:18:16 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.