Re: 'stamping' a la RCS '$Header$'?

Eric Gillespie <epg@pretzelnet.org> writes:

> Karl Fogel <kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net> writes:
>
> > Yes. We're trying to reach a good solution, and hacking on your
> > proposal is the most direct route.
> >
> > The originator's opinion of his proposal is no more important than
> > anyone else's :-).
>
> Fair enough :). I'm just trying to make sure using properties to
> solve this problem isn't discounted purely on the basis of a
> (possibly faulty) proposed method.

Nah, I think properties are a fine way to do this (if we do it at
all). You just provided a springboard for discussion, and while you
admittedly that your idea may not be a good one, I was just trying to
help you remove your uncertainly of its Badness. ;-)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri May 3 16:13:20 2002