Re: update output idea

Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> writes:

> On 26 Apr 2002, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>
> > So here's a new take on the situation: what if 'svn update' actually
> > printed a final feedback line, the way 'svn commit' does?
> >
> > % svn update
> > Updated to revision 1788.
>
> I think that could be useful.
>
> I take it that if nothing is updated, it'll be quiet?

If your entire tree was already at HEAD, it'll be quiet.

If your tree still required revision bumping (but no patching), it
would print the new revision.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Apr 26 15:18:53 2002