[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [Whoops Fwd: Using PostgreSQL instead of Berkeley DB??]

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_lyra.org>
Date: 2002-04-25 01:06:23 CEST

On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 04:38:50PM -0400, Glenn A. Thompson wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote:
> > 'skel_t' is your focus. Anywhere we use a skel_t, implies marshalling of
> > data into a format storable into the BerkeleyDB. The skel_t stuff needs to
> > be BDB specific. Thus, libsvn_fs needs individual C structures for each
> Great approach. Thanks. You have thought about this before I take it?

Oh yah... quite a lot. Some of us also discussed this approach a month or so
ago when I was in Chicago.

Personally, I have two big goals for post-1.0 work: conversion to a SQL
backend, and increased WebDAV/DeltaV capability on the client and server
sides of the network.


Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Apr 25 01:06:30 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.