[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: fs dump/restore proposal

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2002-04-24 22:07:14 CEST

Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:

> Nope. You could restore the repo that way. All you have to do is make
> sure the second dump can refer to nodes in the first dump. You do that
> by using full paths of nodes in the previous revision for the
> references. And I thought we agreed to keep only fulltexts in the
> dump, no diffy stuff.

Well, you can't have it both ways, Branko. :-)

When I dump -r1001:HEAD into a file, I have two mutually exclusive

    * the first revision in the dumpfile is all fulltexts, and every
      subsequent node refers back to them. when loading the file, the
      first revision is imported as whatever revision number is "next"
      in the repository.


    * the first revison refers back to paths that are in pre-1000
      revisions. That means when you load the file, you better be
      loading into a repository that already has the exact 1000
      revisions it wants to see.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Apr 24 22:10:26 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.