[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: fs dump/restore proposal

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2002-04-24 20:54:18 CEST

Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:

> >No, revisions numbers will never change. But the secret, internal
> >equivalent of inode-numbers will definitely change. No working copy
> > or human should be able to tell, however.
> What if you import a dump into a non-empty repository? (Sure, you have
> to know what you're doing, but I wouldn't rule out the possibility.)

What does that mean? That sounds horribly messy.

A dump represents some subset of a repository. I can't imagine what a
mess it would be to somehow "concatenate" N revisions from one
repository onto the end of another.

My (simple) vision was that a dumpfile was a snapshot of a repository,
and it can be used to recreate the repository. Once we start talking
about mixing-and-matching pieces of repositories, we're off in another
world of problems. And I'm not sure that world is important right

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Apr 24 20:57:41 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.