[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: .reg file: any clue?

From: Lalit Jairath <lalit.jairath_at_Barra.COM>
Date: 2002-04-12 19:02:50 CEST

so, what's the final word on this one?

could one be able to use this with the pre-compiled windows binaries. Where
is the info regarding this issue can be found Now and in the Future?

Lalit

-----Original Message-----
From: Karl Fogel [mailto:kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:54 PM
To: cmpilato@collab.net
Cc: Lalit Jairath; 'Kevin Pilch-Bisson'; 'Ben Collins-Sussman';
'dev@subversion.tigris.org'
Subject: Re: .reg file: any clue?

cmpilato@collab.net writes:
> I think Karl was planning on fixing this. Why fix it? you might ask.
> Well, when you use the config files you have the luxury of commenting
> out lines that shouldn't be counted as part of your config. That
> allows someone to see the key/value pairs as examples even if they
> don't use them. In our current registry using case, the only way to
> "comment out" something is to remove the key altogether ... which
> means that if you ever need to re-add that key, you have to dig around
> through documentation to remember the key name and the format of the
> parameter.

Thanks for the reminder, Mike. I'll fix it as best I can; need to
think about whether there are any cases where we need to allow empty
values. If there aren't, then this can be fixed at the config read
level.

-K

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Apr 12 19:11:04 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.