Re: the @ syntax - date format

> BTW: If you are going to talk about ISO8601, then you probably should
> include the timezone indicator even though the default should be the
> time at the zero meridian.

I think local time and zero meridian are both reasonable defaults, but the
standard specifies local time.

> Would it make sense to let a date specification have a prefix character?
>
> @D20020405 implies 2002-04-05T00:00:01Z

it seems to me that this is unavoidable

About the many format in ISO8601: I would not start with implementing all
allowed format. Except if there is an existing parser. I have already
searched for a parser in java but I have not found.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Apr 6 02:38:20 2002