Re: "svn log" bug seems to be in server, not client

On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 02:18:48PM -0600, Karl Fogel wrote:
>...
> Ah, thanks. I guess what puzzled/puzzles me a bit is that there seem
> to be two DTDs for S:log-report.

There is only one DTD, and it allows for both sets of elements.

There are two *semantic* meanings, sure.

And then the DTD thing is all moot anyways since we use a non-validating(*)
parser (on purpose, to allow for future extension)

Cheers,
-g

(*) actually, Neon provides for validating behavior; we are also a bit too
    strict on some of those things -- we need to ensure we don't barf on
    unknown elements.

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org