[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: problem arising from early entry deletion

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2002-03-18 18:30:05 CET

Karl Fogel <kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net> writes:

> But, we'll have to transmit the dirty bit to the server somehow. That
> is, if you tell the server you have directory D at revision 9, and
> then tell it you have the following children of D also at revision 9,
> the server won't assume that any unmentioned children are deleted --
> it will assume they're also at revision 9! :-) So state reports will
> need to incorporate the dirty bit, probably not too difficult (?)...

Yeah, very easy to do. Just add a new callback to the state-report
language that means "this dir is dirty". The server interprets the
command by removing all children of the directory. Then the client
uses existing report language commands to rebuild all the children
that it has.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Mar 18 18:31:16 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.