Re: [PATCH] neon.m4

On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 04:06:55PM -0800, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 06:41:43PM -0500, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> >...
> > I don't feet stronly about this one way or the other (I mean hell,
> > it's just one little text file), but others seem to, and it doesn't
> > seem like we lose anything by just using -lneon, and we gain the
> > ability to be able to build when that file (for whatever reason) is
> > not installed.
>
> .la files provide further dependencies for the application. Thus, we *do*
> lose functionality by avoiding them.
>
> Instead, the patch should test for the .la. If it is present, then use it.
> Otherwise, set up a -L and -l pair for linking.

Aren't we already getting the dependencies from neon-config? Or is
there more information in the .la file?

-garrett

-- 
garrett rooney                     Unix was not designed to stop you from 
rooneg@electricjellyfish.net       doing stupid things, because that would  
http://electricjellyfish.net/      stop you from doing clever things.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org