[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn filesystem without Berkeley DBM?

From: Daniel Berlin <dan_at_dberlin.org>
Date: 2002-03-08 00:37:57 CET

On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Brian Huddleston wrote:

> > > Why was Berkeley DBM choosen?
> >
> > Given the choice of something or nothing, they chose something.
> >
> > Quick, find a non-SQL or non-GPL'd SQL embeddedable server database that
> > supports transactions.
>
> MySQL 3.23. :-)
It's GPL'd, and besides, the BDB backend wasn't stable enough until around
3.23.34, and InnoDB didn't exist until 3.23.34
3.23 wasn't declared stable until Jan, 2001 according to mysql's news
releases.

MySQL 4.0 is what has libmysqld anyway. It's a new feature of 4.0 to
support an embedded server.

--Dan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Mar 8 00:38:57 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.