[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: stupid question (after couple of months with subversion)

From: Kevin Pilch-Bisson <kevin_at_pilch-bisson.net>
Date: 2002-02-27 19:57:56 CET

On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 07:59:54PM +0100, Miroslav Zubcic wrote:
> As subject line said, I have very simple or stupid question about
> working with subversion.
> Let's say that i have working copy, and I change/add/delete couple of
> files, commit and `svn st' will show me status of working copy.
After a commit, svn st should not show anything except '?' files, i.e. ones
that it knows nothing about.
> How can I get clean situation in working copy after that? (No output
> from `st').
> Currently I have to revert modified files, delete new added files, and
> that run `svn up' to get all this again from server and to have clean
> situation.
I don't know what may be going on in your case. Can you send a log of some
commands and there output that shows this behaviour.
> Is there some /easier/ way to do this? How you guys are doing
> this every-day operations?
> Sorry about this simple question on development list, but there is no
> "user" list for subversion/svn AFAIK.
> --
> This signature intentionally left blank
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Kevin Pilch-Bisson                    http://www.pilch-bisson.net
     "Historically speaking, the presences of wheels in Unix
     has never precluded their reinvention." - Larry Wall

  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:37:10 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.