[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH]: svndiff version 1

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2002-02-26 21:26:59 CET

Daniel Berlin wrote:

>On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 12:48, Branko �ibej wrote:
>>Warning: I haven't actually reviewed the patch (it's too big, or my
>>attention span is too short :-), but judging by the description, I think
>>it's *very* nice.
>>Dan -- do you have profiling data to compare between the current
>>implementation and your patch?
>Okay, i get the feeling people think i've replaced vdelta.
Not me. :-)

>I have not.
>I've simply compressed the instruction/data/address stream it outputs.
>vdelta is, as we all know, dictionary based.
>The output of it is reasonably compressable, once you seperate it out
>into the components (instruction stream/address stream/plain text).
>So i've compressed it, which buys us quite a bit.
>My point with the .68 vs 19 seconds is that the extra compression done
>doesn't slow us down at all.
I meant comparison between the current (svndiff 0) and your (svndiff 1)
performance. Obviously the underlying vdelta stays the same, and should
cancel out.

>If you do, I'd really like to see them.
>>I'd also like to compare the times for gzip vs. svndiff1, although
>>that's a bit harder to do
>It's hard to say, since gzip is more optimized than our vdelta
Yeh, I figured.

Brane �ibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:37:10 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.