Re: [PATCH] Updating a locally modified file with endline translation

Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su> writes:
> I don't see any problem here: the second assignment uses the result of the
> first, doesn't it? This is similar to what happens on lines 1784
> and 1808 in the same file.

Indeed -- that makes sense, I misread your code. Thanks!

> > Also it seems odd that the old way would work in most circumstances,
> > yet not for your reproduction recipe.
>
> Does the old way work indeed? Is there any existing test that passes the
> block of code that I've patched?

Perhaps not, since its translation specific, and we've deferred those
tests till the alpha phase.

I'll reexamine with your points in mind,
-K

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:37:08 2006