Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> writes:
> nope, it really is 'filenames', not 'propnames', for pget. pget only
> takes a single propname, as noted by gstein in the issue, so we
> already know what property we're looking for, so why bother printing
> it. the problem is that we can potentially be printing out the
> information for more than one file, and if so, we need to include the
> filename for each one, so you can tell which file has which value set
> for whatever property you're looking for.
>
> well, i suppose technically one could argue that we should be using
> 'target', rather than 'filename', since you can set properties on both
> files and directories, but at this point we're splitting hairs.
> (although i'll change it if anyone feels strongly)
Oh no, filenames is fine, I just misunderstood.
-K
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:37:08 2006