[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Patch command execution

From: Billy Tanksley <btanksley_at_hifn.com>
Date: 2002-02-09 01:37:51 CET

From: cmpilato@collab.net [mailto:cmpilato@collab.net]
>Karl Fogel <kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net> writes:

>> Sticking with the .rej files is fine with me, *especially* if we have
>> a separate tool that can produce a conflict-markered file, given all
>> the relevant data (i.e., you invoke the tool on a single wc path, it
>> knows how to find text-base, rej file, etc).

>...if I can get them this way, I'll never complain! I do rather hope
>that this functionality is internal to svn, though, not just some
>Other Little Binary that I have to keep track of.

I don't mind Another Little Binary, so long as I don't have to keep track of
it. I'd rather have a seperate binary than have to force more user
interface decisions into svn.

But I do want the default installation to be immediately effective.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:37:05 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.