[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Patch command execution

From: Daniel Berlin <dan_at_dberlin.org>
Date: 2002-02-08 15:55:41 CET

> Doesn't this mean that the working file will not contain those bits of
> the patch that apply cleanly? And that the rej-file will contain
> changes that don't conflict? That's not what I would expect.
> Philip, who *likes* the current behaviour.

Maybe it's just me, but it's pretty clear we're gonna end up with an
even split here, half in favor of inserting markers into the file, half
in favor of not doing it.

Thus, I say we implement both behaviors, arbitrarily choose one as the
default, and make it clear in a quick-start guide (or whatever) how to
easily switch to the other.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:37:05 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.