[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Memory consumption w/ large directories

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_lyra.org>
Date: 2002-02-08 03:00:32 CET

On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 02:53:21AM +0100, Branko �ibej wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote:
> >In any case, those three items are all done in the directory pool. After
> >that, it will create the file baton, which has its own subpool.
> >
> >The logic should be changed to create the subpool *first*, do the operations
> >in that subpool, and then pass that to make_file_baton().
> You know, I wouldn't mind reading the entries into the directory pool,
> once, and then *keeping them there*, instead of opening and parsing
> .svn/entries (your favourite number of) times for each updated /
> committed file.

Yes, that would be very good. An orthogonal set of work, of course. I think
that would be part of the overal performance tuning that we need.

(think: strace -o strace.log svn update)


Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:37:05 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.