Re: browsing the repository

Karl Fogel wrote:

>Hey everyone, did we ever reach a consensus on whether or not to
>include this `ls' functionality?
>
>For what it's worth, I'm +1. Although "svn ls" might seem like
>creeping featurism -- okay, *is* creeping featurism -- it's still
>something [almost] everyone wants to do. Making new svn_ra_plugin_t
>functions seems like the right way to go, although instead of exposing
>the node_rev concept, I'd rather see the functions take revs and paths
>like anything else (if the session wants to cache node information, it
>can).
>
>Anyway, implementation details aside, how did people feel about this?
>
+1

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org