RE: The /. article
From: Billy Tanksley <btanksley_at_hifn.com>
Date: 2002-02-06 02:44:10 CET
From: Tom Lord [mailto:lord@regexps.com]
>Sure. Please note that Sean got some facts about arch wrong.
Thank you. Yes, that kinda happens. I'm glad you were able to correct
>So far, the disaster recovery point clearly needs to be fixed and some
I'd love to see the scope of the document changed from a "here's why arch is
I'd like to see a companion document put out by people knowledgable about
> I find it bizzare that "uses a database" would be considered a
>It's simpler to implement, administer, write other tools for, inspect,
All false. (Except for "implement", but I don't see you implementing a
>When choosing betwen a relational, hash table, object or file system
I just don't buy this. I'm sure it seems perfectly self-evident to you; it
They also usually have some halfway decent universal tools, but so do other
>Even that trade-off will
True. ReiserFS, for example, would actually be a useful FS for version
>-t
-Billy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.