Re: Backing out changes: the prefered method?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 30 January 2002 14:45, Greg Hudson wrote:
> "svn rollback" should commit a reversion. "svn destroy-history" or
> something suitably clear should remove revisions from history,

Right. I want to be able to disable 'destroy-history' when I compile the
server, not change the behavior of 'rollback'. If I'm going to be selfish,
if we *must* have 'destroy-history', I'd vote for having it be an option that
you must switch on in configure.

I was unclear -- nay, misleading in the phraseology of my earlier posting.
Sorry for the confusion. I didn't mean to imply what I did.

- --
 |.. If trees screamed, would we be so cavalier about cutting them down?
<|> Maybe, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason.
/|\ --- Jack Handy
/|
 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8WH0bP0KxygnleI8RArdAAJwNynhrM1p+O3dS0FBA0d/Q7cEFMgCgpjc6
ufSJzJfD7OUnluu9pFgI+Fk=
=WKhA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:37:01 2006