Re: Backing out changes: the prefered method?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 30 January 2002 13:26, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> OTOH, a number of businesses *insist* on the ability to change
> history. Joe Shmo just accidentally committed a super-top-secret
> document to the repository. Well, committing a removal isn't enough.
> You've got to remove any trace of the document from the repository.

Yeah. I wonder which situation is more common.

It may be beyond the scope of the first release, but like I said: being able
to configure, at compile time, which behavior you have enabled would be a
Good Thing.

- --
 |.. "Erotic is when you do something sensitive and imaginative with a
<|> feather. Kinky is when you use the whole chicken."
/|\ -- Jon Collee
/|
 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8WHW7P0KxygnleI8RAq2TAJkB+0Bps4pBp1HBCUeEI6TrpgujCwCfUpDh
PXJ3NPX0CvUDbu8RAr0BnEc=
=tUs2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:37:01 2006