Re: Backing out changes: the prefered method?

On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 04:35:51PM -0500, Kevin Pilch-Bisson wrote:
> All well and good, but I wanted to bring up something that seems to have been
> forgotten. How will svn blame deal with reverted code. It would be super
> nifty there was a way to make it go back to the way it was before, instead of
> making it appear that you made a change, when really you just put it back to
> the way someone else made it.
>
> I guess it's not the end of the world if it doesn't happen that way, but it
> would definitely be cool.

i don't like that idea... svn blame should still show that 'you' are
the one who made the change because you are the one who made the
change, you reverted it and then typed 'svn commit'.

(of course, i don't like the idea of svn rollback removing info from
the repository, which is similar to this kind of thing)

-garrett

-- 
garrett rooney                     Unix was not designed to stop you from 
rooneg@electricjellyfish.net       doing stupid things, because that would  
http://electricjellyfish.net/      stop you from doing clever things.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org