Re: Backing out changes: the prefered method?

On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 10:13:07AM -0800, Sean Russell wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wednesday 30 January 2002 08:53, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> > Changed by one line for every single revision? I don't think you saw
> > what you think you saw. Or if you did, I'm worried. Can you be more
> > specific?
>
> ser@valentine Work/rexml/test $ svn log core_test.rb
> - ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> rev 177: ser | Mon 28 Jan 2002 14:21:41 | 1 line
>
>
> - ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> rev 176: ser | Sun 27 Jan 2002 07:46:27 | 1 line
>
>
> - ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> rev 175: ser | Fri 25 Jan 2002 15:34:25 | 1 line

ahh, i see. each commit didn't actually submit a log entry, so the log
entry is empty. with an empty entry, svn log prints out '1 line' for the
length... thus the confusion.

why is it printing 1 line for an empty length? that's the real
question...

-garrett

-- 
garrett rooney                     Unix was not designed to stop you from 
rooneg@electricjellyfish.net       doing stupid things, because that would  
http://electricjellyfish.net/      stop you from doing clever things.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org