cmpilato@collab.net writes:
> Doh. Sorry. Left off my thinking helmet. But yeah, `svn log
> repos-path' could be doable, methinks[1].
Huh? What's wrong with a file:/// url?
-K
> 1. Of course, while not wearing my thinking helmet, "methinks"
> doesn't amount to much.
>
> > I tried that and the "svn log" command currently does not take a
> > repository name, it currently takes a working copy name. Now if you mean it
> > *SHOULD* take a repository name, then that sounds great to me. It took me a
> > bit to figure out how to do it the current way with svnlook and svnadmin
> > command.
> >
> > - David
> >
> > On 29 Jan 2002, cmpilato@collab.net wrote:
> >
> > > Karl Fogel <kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net> writes:
> > >
> > > Of course the following could now just be:
> > >
> > > #!/bin/sh
> > > echo "Content-type: text/plain"
> > > echo ""
> > > `svn log $1`;
> > >
> > > right?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:37:01 2006